Skip to main content
Log in

A data mining approach for segmentation-based importance-performance analysis (SOM–BPNN–IPA): a new framework for developing customer retention strategies

  • Empirical Article
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Importance-performance analysis (IPA) is a simple but effective means of assisting practitioners in prioritizing service attributes when attempting to enhance service quality and customer satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how IPA can be used with market segmentation to develop customer retention strategies for different market segments. For this purpose, a new framework have been proposed that uses self-organizing maps for customers’ segmentation and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) for implicity drive the importance of service attributes based on their effect on customers’ loyalty in each segment. Then, individual IPA matrixes are developed for each market segment. Also, an example case is presented to demonstrate the implementation and application of the proposed framework. The results of the proposed framework compared with a conventional BPNN-IPA approach indicated that it can increase reliability and applicability of IPA results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akroush MN, Al-Mohammad SM, Zuriekat MI, Abu-Lail BN (2011) An empirical model of customer loyalty in the Jordanian mobile telecommunications market. Int J Mobile Commun 9(1):76–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbore A, Busacca B (2011) Rejuvenating importance-performance analysis. J Serv Manag 22(3):409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzopardi E, & Nash R (2012) A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis. Tourism Management

  • Back K-J (2012) Impact-range performance analysis and asymmetry analysis for improving quality of Korean food attributes. Intl J Hosp Manag 31(2):535–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon DR (2003) A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. Int J Mark Res 45(1):55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan MS (2011) Gain the most from your marketing spend on loyalty. Bus Strateg Ser 12(5):219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns RC, Graefe AR, Absher JD (2003) Alternate measurement approaches to recreational customer satisfaction: satisfaction-only versus gap scores. Leisure Sci 25(4):363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan A (2012) Facilitating reef tourism management through an innovative importance-performance analysis method. Tour Manag 33(4):767–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng W-J (2008) Fuzzy importance-performance analysis for determining critical service attributes. Int J Ser Ind Manag 19(2):252–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng W-J, Pei W (2009) Fuzzy neural based importance-performance analysis for determining critical service attributes. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):3774–3784. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng W-J, Chen W-C, Pei W (2008a) Back-propagation neural network based importance–performance analysis for determining critical service attributes. Expert Syst Appl 34(2):1115–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng W-J, Kuo Y-F, Chen W-C (2008b) Revised importance–performance analysis: three-factor theory and benchmarking. Serv Ind J 28(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshghi A, Roy SK, Ganguli S (2008) Service quality and customer satisfaction: an empirical investigation in Indian mobile telecommunication services. Mark Manag J 18(2):119–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnum JO, Hall TE (2007) Exploring the utility of importance performance analysis using confidence interval and market segmentation strategies. J Park Recreat Admin 25(2):64–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Finisterra do Paço AM, Raposo MLB (2010) Green consumer market segmentation: empirical findings from Portugal. Int J Consumer Stud 34(4):429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller J, Matzler K (2008) Customer delight and market segmentation: an application of the three-factor theory of customer satisfaction on life style groups. Tour Manag 29(1):116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver MS (2002) Using dating mining for customer satisfaction research. Mark Res 14(1):8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng X, Chu X (2012) A new importance–performance analysis approach for customer satisfaction evaluation supporting PSS design. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):1492–1502. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks WW, Schneider IE, Budruk M (2004) Extending importance–performance analysis with benefit-based segmentation. J Park Recreation Admin 22(1):53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho L-H, Feng S-Y, Lee Y-C, Yen T-M (2012) Using modified IPA to evaluate supplier’s performance: multiple regression analysis and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst Appl 39(8):7102–7109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H-Y, Lee Y-C, Yen T-M, Tsai C-H (2009) Using BPNN and DEMATEL to modify importance–performance analysis model—a study of the computer industry. Expert Syst Appl 36(6):9969–9979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput Surv 31(3):264–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabiraj S, Shanmugan J (2010) Development of a conceptual framework for brand loyalty: a Euro-Mediterranean perspective. J Brand Manag 18(4–5):285–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano N, Seraki N, Takahashi F, Tsuji S (1984) Attractive quality and must-be quality. J Japanese Soc Quality Control 14(2):147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjaluoto H, Jayawardhena C, Leppäniemi M, Pihlström M (2012) How value and trust influence loyalty in wireless telecommunications industry. Telecommun Policy 36(8):636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M-K, Park M-C, Jeong D-H (2004) The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy 28(2):145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang D, Ma Z, and Qi L (2012) Service quality and customer switching behavior in China’s mobile phone service sector. J Bus Res

  • Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim H, Widdows R, Park J (2006) M-loyalty: winning strategies for mobile carriers. J Consumer Mark 23(4):208–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Martilla JA, James JC (1977) Importance-performance analysis. J Mark 41(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler K, Bailom F, Hinterhuber HH, Renzl B, Pichler J (2004) The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis. Ind Mark Manage 33(4):271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulic J, Prebezac D (2008) Prioritizing improvement of service attributes using impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis. Manag Serv Quality 18(6):559–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulic J, Prebezac D (2012) Accounting for dynamics in attribute-importance and for competitor performance to enhance reliability of BPNN-based importance–performance analysis. Expert Syst Appl 39(5):5144–5153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MM (2009) Shades of green: a psychographic segmentation of the green consumer in Kuwait using self-organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11030–11038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MM (2010) Clustering the ecological footprint of nations using Kohonen’s self-organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl 37(4):2747–2755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MM (2011) A psycho-cognitive segmentation of organ donors in Egypt using Kohonen’s self-organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6906–6915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh H (2001) Revisiting importance–performance analysis. Tour Manag 22(6):617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1999) Whence consumer loyalty? J Mark 63:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezeshki V, Mousavi A, Grant S (2009) Importance-performance analysis of service attributes and its impact on decision making in the mobile telecommunication industry. Meas Bus Excell 13(1):82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M. (1993). Neural networks for statistical modeling: Van Nostrand Reinhold

  • Vaske JJ, Beaman J, Stanley R, Grenier M (1996) Importance–performance and segmentation: where do we go from here? J Travel Tour Mark 5(3):225–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Kiriakos R, Cottrell SP, Khuong MN (2009) Importance-performance and segmentation: an application at a biosphere reserve in Vietnam. J Travel Tour Mark 26(1):30–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Ziaei Bideh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hosseini, S.Y., Ziaei Bideh, A. A data mining approach for segmentation-based importance-performance analysis (SOM–BPNN–IPA): a new framework for developing customer retention strategies. Serv Bus 8, 295–312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0197-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0197-7

Keywords

Navigation