Abstract
Two hundred and sixty-three subjects each gave examples for one of five geographic categories: geographic features, geographic objects, geographic concepts, something geographic, and something that could be portrayed on a map. The frequencies of various responses were significantly different, indicating that the basic ontological terms feature, object, etc., are not interchangeable but carry different meanings when combined with adjectives indicating geographic or mappable. For all of the test phrases involving geographic, responses were predominantly natural features such as mountain, river, lake, ocean, hill. Artificial geographic features such as town and city were listed hardly at all for geographic categories, an outcome that contrasts sharply with the disciplinary self-understanding of academic geography. However, geographic artifacts and fiat objects, such as roads, cities, boundaries, countries, and states, were frequently listed by the subjects responding to the phrase something that could be portrayed on a map. In this paper, we present the results of these experiments in visual form, and provide interpretations and implications for further research.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Battig, W. F., and Montague, W. E., 1968. Category Norms for Verbal Items in 56 Categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80:3, Part 2, 1–46.
Downs, R. M. and Stea, D., 1977. Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York: Harper and Row.
Kohonen, T., 1989. Self-Organization and Asscociative Memory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kohonen, T., 1995. Self-Organizing Maps, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Mark, D. M., 1993. Toward a Theoretical Framework for Geographic Entity Types. In Frank, A. U., and Campari, I, editors, Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences No. 716, pp. 270–283.
Mark, D. M., and Freundschuh, S. M., 1995. Spatial Concepts and Cognitive Models for Geographic Information Use. In Nyerges, T. L., Mark, D. M., Laurini, R., and Egenhofer, M., editors. Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 21–28.
Mark, D. M., Smith, B., and Tversky, B., 1999. Ontology and Geographic Objects: An Empirical Study of Cognitive Categorization. In Freksa, C., and Mark, D. M., editors, Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 1661, 283–298.
Montello, D. R., 1993. Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space. In Frank, A. U., and Campari, I, editors, Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, etc.: Springer, pp. 312–321
OED, 1989. Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition. http://dictionary.oed.com/
Rosch, E., 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. in: T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York, Academic Press.
Smith, B., 1995. On Drawing Lines on a Map. In Andrew U. Frank and Werner Kuhn (eds.), Spatial Information Theory. A Theoretical Basis for GIS. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, etc.: Springer, 475–484.
Smith, B., and Mark, D. M., 1998. Ontology and Geographic Kinds. Proceedings, Eighth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 308–320, http://www.geog.buffalo.edu/ncgia/i21/SDH98.html.
Smith, B., and Mark, D. M. 1999. Ontology with Human Subjects Testing: An Empirical Investigation of Geographic Categories. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58:2, 245–272.
Smith, B., and Mark, D. M., 2001. Geographic Categories: An Ontological Investigation, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, forthcoming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mark, D.M., Skupin, A., Smith, B. (2001). Features, Objects, and other Things: Ontological Distinctions in the Geographic Domain. In: Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42613-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45424-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive